Judge Rules Jay-Z’s Defamation Suit Against Lawyer Tony Buzbee Can Proceed

The legal battle between Jay-Z and Houston attorney Tony Buzbee has escalated, as a California judge ruled that the rapper’s defamation lawsuit against Buzbee has enough merit to proceed to trial. The ruling follows a now-dismissed sexual assault lawsuit in which Jay-Z was accused alongside Sean "Diddy" Combs.

Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Mark H. Epstein determined that Buzbee’s public statements, including social media posts, could be considered defamatory and raised "serious questions" about whether he acted with actual malice — an essential standard in defamation cases involving public figures. The decision represents a significant legal turn in the high-profile case that has entangled some of the biggest names in the music industry.

Buzbee initially filed a lawsuit on behalf of an anonymous woman who claimed she was raped at a 2000 MTV Video Music Awards afterparty. While the original filing did not name Jay-Z, a subsequent amended complaint, submitted in December, identified him directly. The lawsuit was dismissed with prejudice earlier this month, barring it from being refiled. However, Jay-Z has argued that Buzbee’s handling of the case inflicted severe reputational harm.

According to the court, one of the key points of contention is Buzbee’s social media activity. Judge Epstein specifically cited Buzbee’s decision to "like" a post on X (formerly Twitter) that identified Jay-Z as the unnamed defendant in the case, prior to him being formally named. "It’s hard to say that when somebody states, ‘Doe is Carter,’ and your client likes it, it’s not reasonable to infer that your client has affirmed they’re right," Epstein said. He ruled that this, along with Buzbee’s direct statements, constituted grounds for a defamation claim.

The judge also allowed claims to proceed against Buzbee for publicly referring to the plaintiff as a "sexual assault survivor," despite the lack of evidence supporting her allegations, and for remarks made during interviews with outlets such as TMZ and Piers Morgan. In a televised interview, Buzbee suggested his case against Jay-Z was part of a broader legal strategy, stating, "It may not be big names at first, but we have a long list of names." He also told TMZ that his client might take Jay-Z’s advice and "file a criminal complaint" against him, further fueling speculation.

Jay Z release this statement through Roc Nation after the dismissal of the  sexual assault lawsuit filed against him by Houston lawyer Tony Buzbee.

Judge Epstein has not yet ruled on Jay-Z’s extortion claim but left open the possibility of reconsidering it if new evidence is presented. He advised Jay-Z’s legal team to submit additional documentation that might substantiate their argument that Buzbee made settlement demands without his clients’ consent or intention to sue.

The ruling marks a rare legal setback for Buzbee, a high-profile Texas attorney known for taking on powerful figures. His legal battles against Combs have included multiple lawsuits alleging sexual misconduct. However, the dismissal of the Jane Doe case against Jay-Z has now raised questions about his handling of such claims.

Jay-Z also addressed the personal toll of the allegations in his filing, stating that it was "incredibly painful" to explain the situation to his children, particularly his eldest daughter, whose friends could see the headlines and ask questions. "I mourn this loss of innocence for my children, including one who is around the age that the female minor claims to have been when she falsely claims that these heinous acts happened," he wrote.